Taking the DAT: Materials

admin | DAT | Sunday, March 16th, 2008

So, I had this great idea for a post about prep material but I realized, the best place to get that information would probably be SDN. Students are constantly posting about who got what and what they used. I’ve still taken the liberty to do a small bit about the ins & outs of each material I used but bear in mind, I did take mine more than a year ago. However, before you brush me off as an old-timer who’s out of the loop, do realize Kaplan uses the same material year after year without updates. But their big name still gets students to shell out the grand it takes to register for their course. So, do take care to do your own homework.

Here’s a mini-breakdown of the materials I used and what my opinion of them were - not in any particular order.

1) Kaplan - Course (currently: $1399)

The main teacher was an medical student who taught both MCAT and DAT science sections. He knew about as much as the Kaplan-assigned binder he was teaching from. He re-iterated what was already in the manuals in front of us and offered little insight into the actual going ons with the DAT.This girl who did take the DAT came in once in a while to half-heartedly go through the PAT section. She purportedly scored in the 90th percentile. Now that I, myself, have taken the DAT, I don’t know what her 90th percentile means. Did she score in the 90th percentile in all sections or her AA or her TS? And frankly, does it even matter? If she can’t teach (and she couldn’t), she could’ve written the test herself and it wouldn’t have done me any good.

Remember, a good test-taker doesn’t make a good teacher. I know, my name’s on the top of that list.

Bottom line: It’s a gamble. The usefulness of the course depends on the teacher and their teaching ability but that varies greatly depending on location. If you want to take a course, ask around the area. See if there are others with scores you want and ask them who their Kaplan teacher was. Or there’s always the option of the slightly cheaper online version. One last thing, when you sign up for the course, they send you two kaplan books. One is a thin course manual with exercises for the course. The other is a thicker one. That’s the review book which is identical to the blue book they sell in bookstores. Just a heads up.

2. Schaum’s Biology

Boring. I started using this and found it too dry and boring to continue. Paper is gray. Words are tiny. Pictures, minimal. Does the great world of biology a disservice.

3. Topscore ($50) & Achiever ($50)

I group these together because they’re both computerized. That’s their strength. They both contain 3 full length exams for a total of 6 full length exams between them. You have the opportunity to take each section separately or together. I’d urge you to definitely invest in both of them. Taking an exam is more than knowing the answers for each question. That’s a major part of it but the other part that gets frequently overlooked is the actual exam experience. If you ask anyone why they got a low QR score, it’s never “the math was hard”. It’s always, “I ran out of time”. The math is high school math at most - algebra, a dash of trig, some basic probability. Not calculus. Personally, I’m not good with numbers and whip out my phone calculator to tally up restaurant tabs & tip and having had bad experiences with math, D’s in pre-calc and calc 2, my confidence in my math abilities were low. Still, I ended up getting a 20 on the DAT. Not stellar but doesn’t have to be. I’ve seen smarter kids wind up with 17s and 16s. Why? They underestimated time. That’s where a computerized test simulator comes in handy. These aren’t for studying. They’re for gaging your ability to sit through a 4 hour exam and training you in proper time management. How will you know if you’re gonna freak out with 10 minutes left on the counter if you don’t actually put yourself in that situation?

If you can’t see the value in exam simulation, then go ahead and cut this corner. I personally think $100 is a small price to pay.

4. Undergraduate textbooks

If you kept them, great. If you haven’t, it’s not going to make a difference. You could just as easily find the information elsewhere. If you want to know if you should keep them, the only one I’d consider keeping is Campbell’s biology. Keep in mind, I had other sources of study material for organic chemistry and general chemistry. I used Campbell’s biology just to get some info on subjects not covered in my undergrad biology courses - ecology, evolution stuff.

5. DAT Destroyer ($149.95)

A plastic spiral bound book. Not very professional looking but what it lacks in looks, it makes up for in quality. This book is packed to the brim with questions written by a DAT/OChem/Physics tutor. Dr Romano does this for a living. He could be practicing dentistry but he tutors instead. Compare that with Kaplan tutors who take the exam, get a good grade and go back to do some teaching for some extra spending money. Plus, if he’s preparing students for the DAT, don’t you think he’ll follow up with them after they take the exam. They’ll probably even discuss their experience, what worked, what didn’t work, etc. You can piece two and two together. Dr Romano gets personal accounts from real people regarding the actual DAT.

When I used this, it wasn’t any bigger than a regular spiral notebook. Romano’s constantly adding updated questions to this and last I saw from another DAT taker, this thing has ballooned to quite a manual. It’s all Q&A format. Not your typical review book but it works.

***

I’d say find out how you study best then find the material that suits your needs. I bag on Kaplan but plenty of people do well with it. That’s great! The purpose is to find the test prep material to best facilitate your learning.

4 Comments »

  1. How long did you study before you took the DAT?

    Comment by tamika — July 17, 2008 @ 7:57 pm

  2. hi tamika! I startedd studying on June 10th, 2006 and took it August 1st, 2006 … so about 2 months.

    Comment by admin — July 17, 2008 @ 10:56 pm

  3. Hey! Thanks for putting up this site, it really helps to get advice from those that have already taken the DATs. I guess my problem is that I’m having a rough time plowing through chem and o-chem material. It’s been a few years since I took those undergrad courses, and I’ve been reading the material from Kaplan but some parts just aren’t sticking. Any suggestions?

    Also, when you were studying, did you mix it up (i.e. do a little bit of different subjects each day) or just do one subject at a time? I’ve been doing one at a time but it’s so hard to read bio or chem for more than a couple of hours at a time. I know this varies from person to person, but just wanted an idea as to what others have tried and seen results with. What was your study schedule like?

    Thanks!

    Comment by Shannon — September 4, 2008 @ 7:33 pm

  4. Hi Shannon,

    When I was studying, I had just taken Ochem the year before so it was fresh in my mind. Gen Chem I learned mostly from the DAT Destroyer. I relearned all my gen chem from that book. I didn’t have a good time with Kaplan’s stuff, although I’ve heard people swear by it. At some point, you just have to sit down and be willing to shut the world out and just study. It won’t feel it’s sticking but you’ll be surprised what you can recall. And if that isn’t working for you, perhaps look into getting a tutor.

    I would go days doing the same stuff. I mixed it up in the week but I know myself to be a very single-minded person and if I took on more than one subject at a time, it would get all mixed up in my head.

    My daily study schedule for 2 months (June to August) went something like this:
    2-2:30 PM Wake up
    3PM Hit the Gym
    4PM Study
    7-7:15PM Dinner
    4 AM Sleep

    I took a monthly calendar and marked off my test day. From there, I worked backwards. I gave myself a rest day right before the exam (which sorta wasn’t because I was a trained monkey and not studying was weird). 2 days prior was review of old materials. 3 days prior was take final practice exam (topscore or achiever). You get the idea.

    Comment by admin — September 7, 2008 @ 3:51 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck